<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overheard In Providence &#187; dvds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overheardinprovidence.com/category/dvds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overheardinprovidence.com</link>
	<description>A blog by EERac</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 01:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Blu-ray DVDs: Doomed in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.overheardinprovidence.com/2009/01/06/blu-ray-dvds-doomed-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overheardinprovidence.com/2009/01/06/blu-ray-dvds-doomed-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eerac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overheardinprovidence.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to yesterday&#8217;s New York Times, 2009 is a bellweather year for Blu-ray High Definition DVD&#8217;s. According to this blog, however, Blu-ray DVD&#8217;s are doomed. A bold statement, and just the kind of hasty proclamation you can expect from me in 2009. (Second example: One day I will live within 3 blocks of a zoo.)
Now, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/05/technology/05bluray.html" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.nytimes.com');">yesterday&#8217;s New York Times</a>, 2009 is a bellweather year for Blu-ray High Definition DVD&#8217;s. According to this blog, however, Blu-ray DVD&#8217;s are doomed. A bold statement, and just the kind of hasty proclamation you can expect from me in 2009. (Second example: One day I will live within 3 blocks of a zoo.)</p>
<p>Now, when I say &#8220;doomed&#8221;, I don&#8217;t mean Blu-ray DVDs will be gone by 2010. I&#8217;m just predicting that by the time next January rolls around, it will be completely clear to everyone that Blu-ray DVDs are not going to achieve anything close to the success of their standard-definition brethren. In short, Blu-ray DVD&#8217;s are not a successor to normal DVDs, and 2010 is going to be the year of the movie download.</p>
<p>In The New York Times article, Blu-ray supporters are optimistic that the falling price of Blu-ray players (i.e. sub-$200) will finally prompt their widespread adoption. Unfortunately, said supporters don&#8217;t seem to understand that 2009 is also the year of a giant global recession, and back when we weren&#8217;t in the giant recession (like last holiday season), Blu-ray player&#8217;s still sold for $400 dollars. Even worse, up until one year ago, Blu-ray was still in the midst of an absurdly drawn out <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_definition_optical_disc_format_war" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/en.wikipedia.org');">format war</a> with HD DVDs (RIP), which further encouraged sharp-eyed buyers to hold off.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/in-us-hi-def-tv-penetration-tops-23/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/blog.nielsen.com');">Nielsen</a>, about 25% percent of households have a high-definition TV (I got me a big one!), but last November the Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122402823905734467.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/online.wsj.com');">reported</a> that less than 2% of households have a standalone Blu-ray player. Since Playstation 3 also plays Blu-ray DVDs, the percentage of households with Blu-ray buyability is actually closer <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27888849/page/2/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.msnbc.msn.com');">to 7%</a>, but many of those don&#8217;t necessarily HDTVs. Finally, even though it looks like holiday Blu-ray sales <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/autoNews/idUKTRE5051IO20090106" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/uk.reuters.com');">were stronger than expected</a>, the number of households with blu-ray players doesn&#8217;t appear to have increased by more than 1%.</p>
<p>Now consider the competition: Currently (and while you&#8217;re reading this even) you can go to <a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/whatson/movies.html" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.apple.com');">itunes</a> or <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/video/ontv/ontv" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.amazon.com');">amazon</a>, download an HD movie, and proceed to watch that movie, in high-definition, on your already high-definition computer screen. You can also <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/video/ontv/connect/ref=atv_ontv_connect_info" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.amazon.com');">connect your computer</a> to your (HD)TV for $25-$50. If you don&#8217;t much care for dealing with computers (and really who does), Netflix is <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13515_3-10078091-26.html" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/news.cnet.com');">more</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/29/hd-netflix-streaming-comes-to-xbox-360-first/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.engadget.com');">than</a> <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2009/01/lg-launches-net.html" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/blog.wired.com');">happy</a> to stream HD directly to your TV, as is <a href="http://www.vudu.com/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.vudu.com');">vudu</a>, or even the good folks at <a href="http://www.apple.com/appletv/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.apple.com');">apple</a>.</p>
<p>All this brings me to my real point: Blu-ray deserves to fail. Besides that irritating format war <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_definition_optical_disc_format_war" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/en.wikipedia.org');">mentioned up above</a>, Blu-ray is set on pushing antiquated technology. DVDs scratch, and they take up a lot of space, and are slow to start up, and in the case of Blu-ray, you can&#8217;t even play them on most computers (to <a href="http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/10/14/jobs-says-no-blu-ray-again" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.thestandard.com');">quote Steve Jobs</a>, &#8220;Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt&#8221;). Remarkably, all of these problems would fade away except for the absolute worst, most absurd, totally and completely shortsighted thing about DVDs: it&#8217;s <a href="http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071228150136AAxtwoC" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/answers.yahoo.com');">ILLEGAL</a> to copy your own DVDs onto your computer. This isn&#8217;t to say it can&#8217;t be done, you can easily find software that rips DVDs, but because it&#8217;s illegal, this extremely desirable feature can&#8217;t be built into easy-to-use, super-popular programs like iTunes or Windows Media Player.</p>
<p>Shortly after MP3&#8217;s appeared in the mid-90&#8217;s, computer hard drives smashed the 10 GB barrier. All of a sudden it became viable for people to keep music collections on their computers. For years, a digitally-inclined individual could continue to buy CDs, copy the songs to their computer, and not worry about investing in a dead format. CD sales, of course, continued to plummet, but at least their decline was graceful. Now that HDs are breaking the 1TB = 1000GB barrier, it would be completely reasonable to rip your newly purchased (Blu-ray) DVDs to a $100 hard drive, and then transfer those movies to your laptop/ipod/tv-media-thingy as needed. Regrettably, the DVD-gods will have none of it, so by 2011, they&#8217;ll be finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overheardinprovidence.com/2009/01/06/blu-ray-dvds-doomed-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV on the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.overheardinprovidence.com/2007/11/11/tv-on-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overheardinprovidence.com/2007/11/11/tv-on-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eerac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dvds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overheardinprovidence.com/2007/11/11/tv-on-the-internet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a while I&#8217;ve been planning to write about how my house recently decided to save $80 a month and cancel cable. Growing up, I definitely watched a lot of television. When I went to college, I also watched a lot of television. During the first half of grad school, when I lived by myself, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a while I&#8217;ve been planning to write about how my house recently decided to save $80 a month and cancel cable. Growing up, I definitely watched a lot of television. When I went to college, I also watched a lot of television. During the first half of grad school, when I lived by myself, I still watched a lot of television (plus I watched it using a projector, so the number of square inches of video consumed per day was at an all time high). Last year, though, when I moved in with several friends, I watched slightly less television, though still more than anyone else in the house. I guess after a while, TV starts to wear on you.</p>
<p>When I agreed to cancel cable, it was only partially an attempt to watch less TV. As a bona fide <a href="http://www.overheardinprovidence.com/2007/08/02/bittorrent-on-my-mind/" >P2P researcher</a>, and general internet enthusiast, I had a sense that this was the year for internet television. After all, there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/store/tvshows.html" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.apple.com');">iTunes</a>, <a href="http://www.bittorrent.com/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.bittorrent.com');">BitTorrent</a>, more and more <a href="http://www.nbc.com" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.nbc.com');">networks</a> putting <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.thedailyshow.com');">their</a> <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/view/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.pbs.org');">shows</a> online, and <a href="http://newteevee.com/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/newteevee.com');">countless</a> <a href="http://www.vuze.com/content/BrowseChannels.html" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.vuze.com');">apps</a> and <a href="http://www.hulu.com/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.hulu.com');">websites</a> trying out new ways of putting TV stations online. At the moment, most of these options are much less convenient than cable, but many are cheaper, and I remain optimistic. Also in the near future I hope to have a better computer hooked up to our TV.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll probably write more soon about which of the above options work best. For now, I&#8217;m simply announcing that the future of internet-based television is well underway. Plus with the <a href="http://unitedhollywood.blogspot.com/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/unitedhollywood.blogspot.com');">writer&#8217;s strike</a> upon us, maybe we&#8217;ll soon be able to enjoy shows written specifically for the internet (maybe I can even higher some professional writers to help out with this blog). For now, we can just pass the time by watching both television networks and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/09/sonys-stringer-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd-battle-a-stalemate/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.engadget.com');">DVD manufactures</a> fail to provide consumers with a steady flow of newly produced high-quality entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overheardinprovidence.com/2007/11/11/tv-on-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

